« Cotter, trial lawyers, and money | Main | Who's plagiarizing who? »

Schweitzer all wet on fire funding cuts

An Associated Press story carried by the Bozeman Daily Chronicle today has some interesting spin from the gov's office on who's to blame for spending cuts for fire suppression. The story finishes with this: "(Budget Director Dave) Ewer said he thinks lawmakers should remember that Schweitzer asked to have more money on hand to fight fires, a task that appears to be getting increasingly expensive for the state.  The measure, carried by a Republican, died in the GOP-led House."

The big question is, why are we even pointing fingers?  The legislature has historically not funded fire suppression to the extent needed because it's impossible to forecast exactly how much money will be necessary.  The usual method for funding fire fighting is to "borrow" money out of agency budgets, primarily DNRC, and pay the agency back later through supplemental appropriations.  But this governor smells blood in the water and he just can't resist playing partisan games.

Since he brought it up, let's talk about who cut fire suppression funding.

There were two stand-alone bills to increase funding for fire fighting, both sponsored by Republicans.  The first, HB 66 by Rep. Ray Hawk would have established a fund for fire suppression costs set at $25 million using state and federal money.  The second, HB 150 by Rep. Jack Ross, would have increased the Governor's Emergency fund to $25 million, but it was not earmarked for fires, which is part of why it was killed.

Both these bills found themselves on the scrap pile because House Republicans preferred to fund firefighting costs through the main budget bill, HB 2.  Republican Rep. Rick Ripley amended HB 2 to add $10 million for firefighting costs.  When that bill reached the Senate, Democrat Senator Dave Wanzenried amended out the $10 million for firefighting and reallocated $9.8 million to the Dept. of Revenue and $0.2 million to the Historical Society.  Here's a copy of the Wanzenried amendment.

Again, this whole blame game is pointless in our book, but since Schweitzer started the spin on it and wrongly accused Republicans of cutting fire suppression costs, we thought we'd set the record straight.  What's really going on here is that Gov. Schweitzer is gearing up for a special legislative session to pay the bills for this year's wildfires, and he's trying to set the stage to blame Republicans for not funding fire fighting.  We think there's no blame to spread around in this case since this legislature treated fire funding in the historic method.  We just hope the Montana media gets it right this time and recognizes the gov's blatant partisan attitude for what it is.

Posted on Friday, August 24, 2007 at 05:24PM by Registered CommenterCarter in , | Comments4 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

Let's see - if you take a look at this post and the one below a pattern emerges:

1. Take full credit for anything positive whether you had anything to do with how they got that way or not. Alleluia!
2. Blame the other guys for anything negative (or that you can make appear negative) before they can blame you. Alleluia!
3. Don't bother to go even a silly millimeter below the surface to explain why something has gotten to be a positive or negative. Alleluia!
4. Continue to act as though the "facts don't matter." Alleluia!
5. And always remember the Golden Rule of Politics: "Do unto others before they can do unto you". Alleluia in Excelsius!

Brian Schweitzer is a high priest in the Church of Political Expediency. Why is anyone shocked, surprised, or amazed when he practices his religion?

Wasn't it Karl Marx who called religion "the opiate of the masses"? Based on his favorability rating, BS is obviously one of the most effective drug pushers in the country. The majority of Montanans seem to be very content to drink the Kool-aid he keeps serving up.

Dominus vo biscum.

August 25, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterAuntie Lib

Amen Auntie Lib.

August 25, 2007 | Registered CommenterCarter

Auntie Lib, you are the BEST, I'm so glad somebody knows a Con Man when they see one!

August 27, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterWatching with Interest

Carter, you might want to change your name to "Karnac the Magnificent". Seems like you're ahead of the MSM again! Way to go!

August 28, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterAuntie Lib

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>